Paul G. Bursiek: Response to David Brooks’ ‘Where are the liberals?’ column

Amazing that David Brooks, a conservative political writer, who usually preaches the virtues of law, custom and tradition, would shift gears in his January 12 editorial (Where Are The Liberals?”) by using Martin Luther, a 16th century church radical, who caused the Catholic church to splinter, as the historical model for President Obama to follow in restoring faith and trust in our government.

Also, unpredictably, Mr. Brooks looks to liberal democrats, not Republicans, to reform our system. Has he given up on Republicans, are they beyond redemption, or does he simply think they have achieved maximum ideological purity, requiring no change?

I suggest there is a less dramatic solution. Restrain the Senate’s destructive use of the filibuster rule. Without a constructive limit on that rule, no person (the next “Martin Luther” or otherwise) will be able to accomplish the progressive reforms necessary to make our system more just.

Paul G. Bursiek
Boulder

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Paul G. Bursiek: Response to David Brooks’ ‘Where are the liberals?’ column

  1. Do you have a spam issue on this website; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; many of us have created some nice methods and we are looking to trade techniques with others, please shoot me an email if interested.

  2. escort bayan says:

    eskort kız escortlar bedava bayan sex

  3. I’m not that significantly of a internet reader to be honest but your blogs truly good, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your web site to come back in the future. All the greatest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>