Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections

Pressure for all-mail balloting is relentless. All-mail balloting seems to me to be more like an administrative procedure than an election.

Fair and honest elections include oversights based on hard-learned experience. Most of those controls get tossed out with all-mail balloting.

The claim of a higher turnout with all-mail balloting is certainly not true as a general rule. No valid studies support claims of increased turnout. The best, though insufficient, studies I have seen suggest turnout declines with all-mail balloting over time.

Do we really want to argue that we can’t afford real elections because all-mail is cheaper? If real democracy cost a little more, do we just skip it for an administrative procedure? Costs can be shuttled around to reach predetermined conclusions regarding all-mail versus precinct elections. For example, in precinct elections, sworn election judges maintain a chain-of-custody of the live ballots—formally an essential part of election integrity. The equivalent for all-mail balloting would be to send the ballots by certified mail using sworn postal workers and have each voter show an ID and sign for the ballot at his/her door. How would adding this piece of election integrity affect election cost?

My final point: Nellie is my lovely eighty-year-old neighbor. Her son pitched out her mail ballot. He didn’t think it was important. She had planned to vote, but couldn’t. Were she younger, she might have found an alternative way to vote on short notice. As it was, her vote was lost. It would have been cast if she could have voted in the precinct. So this all-mail procedure meant this one vote was lost. Does it matter? It does to me. Does it to you?

Ivan C. Meek
Louisville

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

114 Responses to Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections

  1. Wow, marvelous blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is excellent, let alone the content!. Thanks For Your article about Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the Editor .

  2. Wow, incredible blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your web site is fantastic, let alone the content!. Thanks For Your article about Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the Editor .

  3. Hello may I repeat some of the perspicacity from this despatch if I provender a link subvene to your site?

  4. Wow, incredible blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is fantastic, let alone the content!. Thanks For Your article about Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the Editor .

  5. Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the Editor I was suggested this web site by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my difficulty. You are amazing! Thanks! your article about Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the EditorBest Regards Agata

  6. Len Stallins says:

    I enjoy you because of your whole hard work on this site. My daughter delights in participating in investigations and it’s simple to grasp why. A number of us notice all concerning the compelling ways you deliver helpful information by means of this web site and therefore attract contribution from other people on this point then our simple princess is without a doubt studying a lot of things. Take advantage of the remaining portion of the new year. You’re the one carrying out a useful job.

  7. Hey There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and return to read more of Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the Editor . Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely return.

  8. Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the Editor I was suggested this blog by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my difficulty. You’re amazing! Thanks! your article about Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the EditorBest Regards Cassetta

  9. Android Apps says:

    Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article. I’ll be sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of Ivan C. Meek: No all-mail elections | Daily Camera: Letters to the Editor . Thanks for the post. I’ll certainly return.

  10. Your web page doesn’t render properly on my i phone – you may wanna try and repair that

  11. Oh my goodness! an amazing article. Thank you!

  12. Hanh Kashuba says:

    I was suggested this website by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my trouble. You are amazing! Thanks!

  13. Pingback: www.searscard.com

  14. I was forced to go into the pool last night with just my panties and my t shirt. Bad day to wear cheeky boy shorts lmao

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>