There you go, again. A third day and another defense of the indefensible.
Apparently, the “scientists” at NCAR and among the global warming alarmists utilize the same English words and sentence structure as we mere mortals. However, when they use these words, they have entirely different meanings: black equals white, good equals evil, honesty and integrity means exactly the opposite. In excusing their behavior, they claim “shorthand”. What blatant misrepresentation.
You claim, “most e-mails appear benign”. So? It is the ones that describe their deception, misrepresentation, hiding of facts, stifling of dissent and fraud that aren’t so benign. The ones that direct destruction of the evidence, subject to English Freedom of Information laws, that are so damning. Those are the e-mails that demonstrate the lack of integrity of these people. Yet, the Camera is front and center in the follow-on disguise of reality. Why? Could it be the overwhelming bias among the Camera organization?
It isn’t surprising, of course, that NCAR would attempt to protect its rice bowl. So accustomed to dining at the government trough, fully aware that fear tactics maintain, even increase the supply of slop, they now circle the wagons and suggest that deception, lies, hiding the facts and stifling dissenters really is the essence of science, at least as practiced by government agencies.
There is a growing list of scientists that refute the findings of these zealots.
Don R. Sherwood